electricity_is_life

"What if you operate a SaaS on your infrastructure and your users could choose where their data lives - on their own infrastructure, in their own jurisdiction?" I read the explanation of this on your website but I still don't really get it; why would a customer want that vs a normal self-hosted product where they host the UI in addition to the backend? Using a cloud-hosted UI seems like it would introduce a lot of security and compliance issues, and if the customer is already hosting the entire backend themselves It seems like they could pretty easily host the static UI server too.

Bizarre collection of whataboutism and non sequiturs. I really hope that's LLM output.

"On the ethics question, I don't have a clean answer. The market clearly thinks the category has value." Sounds like your answer is you know this is unethical (and cause for immediate dismissal from most companies), but you don't care as long as you make money.

Isn't this just Cluely? How many interview cheating startups do we need?

I assume this is somehow going to turn into an ad for the security tool you're posting about elsewhere. https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1t9yk7q/i_built_a_supabase_security_tool_ran_it_against/

Obviously it depends on your goals. Supabase is not just Postgres; if all you want is managed Postgres hosting you can find that cheaper elsewhere. Or hosting your own might make sense, if you have the necessary knowledge. The post you screenshotted looks like LinkedIn engagement bait nonsense, I definitely wouldn't take advice from anyone that talks like that.

You built it in a weekend with Claude Code and the whole thing is on-device, but you still want people to pay $5 and have to check in with your server every 24 hours?